Colin Kaepernick tweeted earlier this week that he’s “still ready” to play. He remains “eager” to prove he still can play http://www.raidersauthorizedshops.com/authentic-hunter-renfrow-jersey , too.Rob Maaddi of the Associated Press quoted a source close to Kaepernick as saying, “Colin has always been prepared to compete at the highest level and is in the best shape of his life.”The question is whether Kaepernick ever gets another chance in the NFL. It seems unlikely considering he has not played since Week 17 of the 2016 season and settled a collusion grievance with the NFL in February. Every signing of a no-name quarterback on the transaction write is another sign Kaepernick’s ship has sailed.The Texans signed quarterback Jordan Ta’amu earlier this week.The Eagles, who lost Nate Sudfeld to a fractured wrist Thursday Zach Brown Jersey , are not immediately seeking a backup quarterback with Sudfeld expected back in six weeks.President Trump gave his blessing to an NFL team employing Kaepernick. But he added a caveat: “Only if he’s good enough.”Kapernick, 31, may have to go prove that in the XFL first if he wants another chance in the NFL. The city of Oakland has filed a federal antitrust lawsuit trying to recover damages for the Raiders’ upcoming move to Las Vegas.The suit filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Raiders Shareef Miller Jersey , the NFL and the other 31 clubs seeks lost revenue, money Oakland taxpayers invested in the Raiders and other costs. The suit does not ask the court to prevent the Raiders’ move to Las Vegas but asks for damages that will help pay off the approximately $80 million in debt remaining from renovations on the Coliseum.The city says the defendants violated federal antitrust laws and the league violated its own relocation policies when the teams voted in March 2017 to approve the Raiders’ decision to move to Las Vegas.The Raiders do not have a lease for a home next year and team owner Mark Davis has said he will not play in Oakland if a lawsuit were ever filed.The release stated that by approving the team’s move to Las Vegas, the league was “boycotting Oakland in the marketplace for hosting a football club” and “violated federal antitrust laws while the Raiders’ move also violated the NFL’s own policies for team relocation.”The NFL and the Raiders didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.